Therefore, a flexible and expandable framework is necessary to go beyond project-based frameworks applied to case specific conditions.
![diva for rhino free download diva for rhino free download](https://web.mit.edu/sustainabledesignlab/projects/DIVATutorials/T02.jpg)
Design frameworks introduced to this day either do not incorporate bio-inspired concepts or are not able to map potential trade-offs in the performance of multi-functional biomimetic adaptable skins, effectively. As opposed to traditional methods, the implemented biomimetic design approach in this research can assist in finding solutions for complex real-life problems regarding the adaptability of kinetic facades to achieve robustness, tractability, low solution cost and better rapport with reality. Today, the tendency towards sustainability has created new design approaches regarding adaptable kinetic building envelopes, amongst all, biomimetic design principles have gained interest. Due to increasing demands to satisfy environmental, social, and economic requirements, designing efficient and sustainable buildings has become increasingly complex. Specifically, it concludes that building science should normalize a more holistic view of comfort and perform more exploratory and qualitative research.Ĭlimate change, increase in CO2 production and energy consumption are major global issues and the building, environmental and construction sector is contributing to the increasing concern day by day. However, incorporating “the mind” into building science’s research and practice implies embracing tools, research methods and conceptual frameworks that have historically not been used by such a discipline. Thus, theories and models of comfort that ignore it fail to represent properly the concept of comfort held by the people for whom buildings are designed. The reason for this is that “the mind” plays a significant role in the development of people’s comfort. This research concludes that embracing “the mind” is not only possible but necessary. For instance, it guided the development of a quantitative Feeling of Comfort model and also of a prototype building simulation tool that embraces “the mind” and thus can potentially estimate people’s Feeling of Comfort. The Feeling of Comfort model not only was capable of making sense of the new data (gathered in this second study) but also proved to be simple enough to be useful in the context of comfort research and practice. These results were then replicated in a second study in which another group of 24 people-also from Chile and New Zealand-described “a home with good acoustic performance”, “a home with good air quality” and “a pleasantly cool home”. This model was developed from the results of a first study in which 18 people-from Chile and New Zealand-were asked to describe “a home with good daylight” and “a warm home” in their own words. This research proposes a new qualitative model of the Feeling of Comfort that embraces “the mind”. This research refers to these elements together-i.e., people’s non-physical personal factors and cognition-as “the mind”.
![diva for rhino free download diva for rhino free download](http://clipart-library.com/new_gallery/325-3255397_diva-for-rhino-logo.png)
This research partially mitigates this contradiction by exploring people’s non-physical personal factors and cognition within the context of their comfort and by proposing a way in which they can be incorporated into building science research and practice. This is a contradiction because, even if comfort is supposed to be subjective, most of the complexity of “the subject” is avoided by focusing on physiology and, even if comfort is supposed to reside in the mind, the cognitive processes that characterize the mind are disregarded.
![diva for rhino free download diva for rhino free download](https://energy-models.com/sites/all/files/blog_images/3.jpg)
By prioritizing usability, building science has produced models of comfort (e.g., acoustic, visual and thermal) that overly simplify this concept to something nearly objective that can be directly associated with people’s physiology and measurable and quantifiable environmental factors. Despite this, capturing all the complexity, subjectivity and richness of this construct in models that are useful in building science contexts is far from straightforward. The fact that comfort is a subjective state of the mind is widely accepted by engineers, architects and building scientists.